Officers back 14 homes at 1 The Green, Drayton despite 23 objections. Five would be affordable, four for social rent. The Vale committee approved it on 16 September.
Update, 27 September 2026: the committee approved this application on 16 September, with delivery windows of 7.30am to 9.30am and 4pm to 6pm and no building work on Sundays. The decision and the new conditions.
Fourteen homes on a single plot in Drayton, about two miles south-west of Abingdon, will be decided by councillors on Wednesday 16 September. Officers have recommended approval, against 23 letters of objection and an objection from Drayton Parish Council.
The application, P25/V2033/FUL, would demolish a detached bungalow, its garage and workshop at 1 The Green, Drayton, OX14 4JA and replace them with 14 houses. That is a net gain of 13 homes on a site of about 0.4 hectares. The applicant is Helix Construct Limited.
The scheme reaches committee only because the parish council objected. Under the council’s scheme of delegation that triggers a public decision rather than an officer one, and from 31 October most applications will stop reaching the committee at all.
What is proposed
The report by case officer Sally Wright, published in the committee’s agenda pack on 3 September, sets out a scheme that has already shrunk once. It was submitted as 15 homes and amended to 14. The layout and dwelling types changed too, to answer technical objections from five consultees:
- Oxfordshire County Council as highway authority
- the council’s ecology officer
- its landscape architect
- its affordable housing team
- its waste management officer
The 14 homes break down as:
- 5 affordable homes: 4 for social rent, 1 shared ownership, in 2 and 3 bed sizes
- 9 market homes: two 2-bed, five 3-bed and two 4-bed
Policy CP24 of the local plan requires 35 per cent affordable housing, which on a net gain of 13 homes works out at 4.55 units. The applicant has rounded that up to five. The affordable housing team agreed the scheme would not have to deliver First Homes. The rented units will be Social Rent rather than the more expensive Affordable Rent. The report says that keeps them “genuinely affordable for residents with a local connection to the district”.
Parking is two spaces per house plus three visitor spaces, 31 in total, with cycle storage for two bicycles per home and electric vehicle charging to be secured by condition.
The site sits outside the Drayton conservation area, though the boundary is within 20 metres of it. The nearest listed building, 15 The Green, is Grade II and about 35 metres to the south-east.
What the objectors said
Twenty-three letters of objection have been received, 14 at the first consultation in October 2025 and nine more after the scheme was amended in June 2026. One letter of support was received, and no neutral comments. The recurring themes are:
- overdevelopment of a small village plot, with cramped layouts and small gardens
- the suitability of the access off Kiln Lane, which is narrow, a public right of way and heavily used on foot
- extra traffic through the village, which objectors say is already worse during A34 diversions
- surface water flooding and drainage
- loss of trees, a pond and wildlife habitat
- overlooking and loss of privacy for neighbours on Ashby Court and Marcham Road
- pressure on the village primary school
Drayton Parish Council objected in October 2025, arguing that the plot could not absorb the number of houses proposed and that the applicant’s transport case was “misleading” because it counted school buses and a night service alongside the X2, which runs roughly every 20 minutes. The parish council made no comment on the amended scheme in June 2026.
Ward member Councillor Andy Cooke also objected in October 2025, saying a geotechnical assessment had rated the land red for residential construction and that permission should not be granted until further investigation had been done. He did add that he supported the shift towards smaller properties, which is what the Drayton Neighbourhood Plan asks for.
The refuse lorry objection that went away
The most significant technical objection came from Oxfordshire County Council as highway authority, which was still objecting in June 2026 because swept path clearance for a refuse vehicle had not been demonstrated.
That objection has since been dropped. The council’s own waste management officer confirmed the tracking showed a full-size refuse vehicle could move through the site unimpeded. The report then records that the highway authority “has advised that its concerns would not be capable of being sustained as a reason for refusal”. No statutory consultee now maintains an objection.
One consultation point does not resurface in the officer’s conclusion. Oxfordshire County Council’s education team raised no objection to the contributions, but noted “there is a risk that village primary school capacity would be insufficient and should be considered in the planning balance”. The report’s planning balance at section 9 weighs housing supply, biodiversity gain and construction economics against tree loss, traffic and construction disturbance. It does not return to the primary school point.
What the developer would pay
If permission is granted, the report says a section 106 agreement would secure the affordable housing plus these financial contributions.
| Contribution | Amount | Towards |
|---|---|---|
| Secondary education | £144,202 | Expanding secondary school capacity |
| Public transport | £14,105 | Bus services near the site |
| Special educational needs | £11,804 | Oxfordshire special school expansion |
| BNG monitoring | £7,898 | Monitoring on-site biodiversity gains |
| Public art maintenance | £5,583 | 15 years of monitoring and repairs |
| County monitoring fee | £5,680 | Monitoring the agreement |
| Public art | £5,317 | Off-site, within the parish |
| Waste bins | £3,934 | Wheelie bins on site |
| Household waste recycling | £1,346 | Expanding recycling centres |
| District monitoring fee | £1,258 | Monitoring the agreement |
| Street naming | £562 | Naming the new street |
Those figures total £201,689, including the monitoring fees, and all are index linked. The site is also liable for the Community Infrastructure Levy.
The recommendation is not a straight approval. Officers ask the committee to delegate a resolution to grant permission to the Director of Planning, in consultation with the chair, subject to 21 conditions and completion of the section 106 agreement.
What it means for you
The meeting is at 7pm on Wednesday 16 September in Meeting Room 1 at Abbey House, Abbey Close, Abingdon, OX14 3JE. It is open to the public and is streamed on the council’s YouTube channel.
To speak, you have to register with planning services at PlanningBusinessEnquiries@southandvale.gov.uk by noon on the last working day before the meeting, which is Tuesday 15 September. You are only eligible if you already made a written response to the consultation on the application. Each category of speaker, meaning the parish council, objectors and supporters, gets a maximum of three minutes in total, according to the council’s Planning Committee page. If several people register in the same category, they share the time.
Two other applications are on the same agenda, neither of them in Abingdon:
- a loft and rear extension with a garden annexe at 4 Raleigh Park Road, North Hinksey, on the western edge of Oxford
- a hybrid application for a link road and up to 75,000 square metres of employment floorspace at Signia Park, on the former Didcot A power station site about three miles south of Abingdon (our report on it)
We track decisions like this one on our Abingdon planning news page, and the practical stuff for households is on our bin collection days and council tax bands pages.
Sources: Vale of White Horse District Council, Planning Committee agenda and reports pack, 16 September 2026, including the officer report on P25/V2033/FUL; The Planning Committee: speaking at a meeting. All checked 8 September 2026.
Correction, 11 September 2026: this article originally said the former Didcot A power station site was about ten miles south-east of Abingdon. It is about three miles south.
Have your say